Author Topic: That was the (Automotive) Year that Was: 1980  (Read 21215 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Otto Puzzell

  • Founder and
  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 31556
  • Country: us
  • Puzzle Points 444
  • Open field, with a window.
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
    • AutoPuzzles
That was the (Automotive) Year that Was: 1980
« on: May 31, 2006, 10:42:07 AM »
Special thanks to Boxer2500 for this outstanding thread idea. This thread will be about the year 1980. Additional years will be posted anon. 

Shall we begin?

Warning - this was a bleak year, automotively speaking!  :P
« Last Edit: May 31, 2006, 01:26:41 PM by KarnUtz »
You wanna be the man, you gotta Name That Car!

Offline Otto Puzzell

  • Founder and
  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 31556
  • Country: us
  • Puzzle Points 444
  • Open field, with a window.
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
    • AutoPuzzles
Re: That was the (Automotive) Year that Was: 1980
« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2006, 10:43:47 AM »
Union On The Board

Douglas A. Fraser, president of the UAW, was named to the Chrysler Corporation Board of Directors, becoming the first union representative ever to sit on the board of a major U.S. corporation.

Born in 1916 in Glasgow, Scotland, to a Socialist father, Fraser was brought up to the tune of organized labor. He dropped out of high school and began work at a Dodge plant as a metal polisher. Fraser soon moved to the DeSoto plant in Detroit, where he began his career in labor activism.

Rising through the ranks of his local UAW chapter, Fraser eventually caught the eye of powerful UAW figure Walter Reuther(ed note: remember this communist from the other day). Reuther's similar immigrant and Socialist background meant that the two men shared ideas in common. Fraser worked as Reuther's administrative assistant through the groundbreaking years of the 1950s, during which the UAW solidified policies on retirement pensions and medical care for its members. Like Reuther, Fraser believed that to achieve its goals the UAW needed to be willing to make reasonable compromises. It wasn't until 1977 that Fraser was elected president of the UAW.

He inherited the title as the automotive industry suffered its greatest recession since the Depression. Fraser is credited with having led the UAW through the uncertain years of the globalization of the automotive industry. As it became evident that the Big Three could build their cars wherever they wanted, Fraser fought to make sure that the union stayed flexible in its negotiations with industry executives. His detractors sometimes accused Fraser of pandering, but those who knew him described him as a stern proponent of international labor causes. His flexibility owed to his desire to keep the union an open-minded and competitive organization.

The New York Times described Fraser as "an extremely tough-minded unionist, like most who rise through the ferocious fighting that can characterize union politics." In 1973, Fraser helped to solidify the industry's "thirty and out" policy. During his presidency, Fraser attempted to address the less tangible hardships facing autoworkers. Gone were the days of unfair hours and dangerous conditions, but the monotony that faced the average autoworker was still a cross to bear.

In 1982, Fraser enacted his most daring and visionary maneuver as UAW president. Faced with Chrysler's imminent collapse, Fraser negotiated away millions of dollars already guaranteed to his union in order to help save a company with valuable jobs. In return, Chrysler traded stock options to the union. The resurgence of Chrysler bore out Fraser's unpopular decision. Respected by his adversaries, Fraser received the unprecedented accolade of being named to Chrysler's board. "His word is enough for us," one Chrysler executive explained. "He gets into plant problems like no other union leader I know." Conceding that his position on Chrysler's board was largely symbolic, Fraser nevertheless strove to bring the issues of the laborer into the boardroom. It is one thing to vote to close a plant on paper and quite another to vote after hearing in detail the hardship the decision will cause. Douglas Fraser was a proud and unselfish leader who must be remembered for maintaining his ideals, even after his prosperity made them unnecessary.

You wanna be the man, you gotta Name That Car!

Offline Otto Puzzell

  • Founder and
  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 31556
  • Country: us
  • Puzzle Points 444
  • Open field, with a window.
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
    • AutoPuzzles
Re: That was the (Automotive) Year that Was: 1980
« Reply #2 on: May 31, 2006, 10:47:41 AM »
Auto plant vs. neighborhood: The Poletown battle

In 1981, General Motors and the cities of Detroit and Hamtramck collaborated in a grand plan to bring industry back to what was perceived as a dying city, to add to the two cities' tax coffers and to keep the automotive business centered in Detroit. In the process, the city lost a neighborhood, the Catholic Archdiocese lost the faith of some of their flock and 4,200 people lost their homes.

At the tail end of the once promising urban renewal movement of the 1960's, Detroit had not seen much improvement. Neighborhoods had been razed for expressways, or for 'new development' which never materialized. Stores and shops were closing down at a rapid pace, churches were losing their congregations to the suburbs, and industry was turning elsewhere, moving out to the far suburbs where space was not at a premium and crime and crumbling infrastructure were not issues.

And then General Motors and Detroit Mayor Coleman Young hatched a plan: If the city would get the land, the auto company would build a state-of-the-art plant, crossing the border with Hamtramck, employing 6,000 people and providing a glittering example of what the auto companies and their suppliers could do in the city of their birth.

At first glance the project seemed brilliant. In 1979, the old Dodge Main plant in Hamtramck had closed and that city lost $1.7 million in tax revenue. Hamtramck was happy to join in the deal. But there were obstacles in Detroit -- 1,300 homes, 140 businesses, six churches and one hospital lay in the path of the proposed plant.

The neighborhood adjacent to Hamtramck's southern border was, like Hamtramck, home to Poles as well as Albanians, Yugoslavs, Blacks, Yemenis and Filipinos. But some families had been there for generations, since the influx of Polish workers to the auto plants in the 1920s and '30s, and even before. Some of the first Polish settlements in the city in the 1870s had been in this area. It was the home of the original St. Mary's College and Polish Seminary at the corner of St. Aubin and Forest. It was the original location for the International Institute. St John the Evangelist Catholic Parish had been founded there in the 1890s, Immaculate Conception Parish in 1918.

Many homeowners agreed at the outset to sell their homes to the city and leave their crumbling neighborhood. The old workingmen's houses, once solid, were losing mortar or siding. Blight was already driving residents north in the city and to Warren and Sterling Heights.

Buyout prices for the homes started at $6,000 and averaged $13,000. Residents were eligible for up to an additional $15,000 for the difference in price of their new home and their buyout price. Another $3,500 could be available for moving by a certain time, and tax differences. Not everyone was satisfied with the offers, though.

John Saber, a retired photographer who had lived in his home on Kanter Street for 46 years, was offered $15,000 for his home, but refused, suing the city for $15 million. Acting as his own lawyer, he claimed damages for, among other things, destruction of a miraculous apparition on his window sill, his 'prize' cats being eaten by dogs abandoned by departing neighbors and an art studio that he would have built on the empty lot next door.

Resistance began to build as some residents took in the scope of the project. There were lawsuits and sit-ins and demonstrations.
Opposition to the plan was centered in Immaculate Conception Roman Catholic Church. The Archdiocese of Detroit went along with the city's plan and had agreed that the two Catholic churches in the way of the project (Immaculate Conception and St. John the Evangelist) would be sold to the city, and the parishes combined with other nearby parishes. Cardinal John F. Dearden made the decision early in the planning stages of the project.

He could not have been expecting such resistance from a mild 59-year-old pastor, and his few parishioners. The Reverend Joseph Karasiewicz led his flock in their protest against the taking of the land and the razing of the church. Raised in nearby St. Hyacinth's mostly Polish parish, Father Karasiewicz had attended St. Mary's Polish Seminary. He defied his Cardinal and fought to keep the Church open for his faithful.  John Saber stands guard in front of his home on Kanter. He was one of the last holdouts, suing the city for $15 million.
 
The parishioners' letter-writing campaign lured a national power hitter: Ralph Nader. Joining forces with the Poletown Neighborhood Council, Nader's Raiders began a public relations war against General Motors and the city of Detroit. Nader called Coleman Young a "petty dictator." Young called him a "carpetbagger from Washington" and claimed he had a "psychotic hatred of GM." His press releases, cranked out from the basement of Immaculate Conception, brought national attention to the dispute. The New York Times, Washington Post, L.A. Times and CBS News all came to town to do stories on the sacrifice of a neighborhood to a corporate giant.

But another Poletown group, the Citizens District Council, supported the plan. Gary Campbell, a Poletown resident and bar owner, accused the opposing group of calling secret meetings with Nader and Gray Panther leader Maggie Kughn and then presenting opinions of a small minority as if they represented the entire neighborhood.

The City Council of Detroit was in almost unanimous agreement with Coleman Young on the issue. Only Kenneth Cockrel voted against the October 1980 resolution authorizing acquisition and demolition of the properties. Publicity notwithstanding, the Archdiocese stood firm on the church closing. While the Rev. Karasiewicz's parishioners were passionate, they were few and declining in numbers. A news article of the time placed the number of worshipers at a normal Sunday Mass at around 30.

Eventually time ran out for the protesters. Wayne County Circuit Court Judge George T. Martin rejected arguments that the condemnation proceedings were illegal. The Michigan Supreme Court, in a 5-2 decision in March of 1981, ruled that Detroit could clear the whole site for GM.

The last official Mass in Immaculate Conception was in May of 1981. A 29-day sit-in at the Church came to an end on July 14, 1981. Police forcibly evicted 20 people from the church and arrested 12, only three of whom were from Poletown. Much of the opposition to the project seemed to come from outsiders. One of the protesters complained that "if you had to rely solely on these residents here, the area would be gone by now." The wrecking ball finished its work on July 16 at 3 p.m. A year later, bitter residents told a News reporter they were not reconciled to their move. Ann Locklear said she had "lost my faith in the Church, the city and General Motors.

Louise Crosby's husband George became depressed after the couple moved to the Van Dyke- Seven Mile area. "He kept saying, 'I want to go home, I want to go home.'" One winter day he left the house and was found three hours later wandering in the bitter cold. He ended up in a nursing home.

But a study conducted by University of Michigan researcher Leon Pastalan concluded that most are better off. The study showed 87 percent of the former Poletown residents older than 60 and 84 percent of younger former residents were happy in their new homes. Only 39 percent said relocation payments did not cover the costs of their new home.

From the Detroit news Archives
You wanna be the man, you gotta Name That Car!

Offline Otto Puzzell

  • Founder and
  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 31556
  • Country: us
  • Puzzle Points 444
  • Open field, with a window.
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
    • AutoPuzzles
Re: That was the (Automotive) Year that Was: 1980
« Reply #3 on: May 31, 2006, 10:55:51 AM »
The Dodge Mirada

Introduced in 1980, the Dodge Mirada was produced until 1983. The Mirada was a full size coupe and replaced the Dodge Mangum. Dodge equipped with Mirada with rear wheel drive and based it on the Chrysler J platform. The Mirada shared its platform with vehicles such as the Chrysler Cordoba and the Imperial that were produced during the same period.

The Mirada was powered by Slant 6, a 318 in LA V8, and a 360 inch LA V8. The engines were coupled with a three speed automatic. The Mirada was predicted to sell quite well and do well in its class against vehicles such as the Buick Regal, the Chevrolet Monte Carlo the Ford Thunderbird, and the Mercury Cougar, but didn't. With big rivals such as GM and Ford, the Mirada just didn't seem to get the consumers attention, and as a result it was produced for just three years. Due to poor sales the Dodge 600 replaced the Dodge Mirada in 1983.

You wanna be the man, you gotta Name That Car!

Offline Otto Puzzell

  • Founder and
  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 31556
  • Country: us
  • Puzzle Points 444
  • Open field, with a window.
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
    • AutoPuzzles
Re: That was the (Automotive) Year that Was: 1980
« Reply #4 on: May 31, 2006, 01:21:44 PM »
Toyota Tercel

The Toyota Tercel was a subcompact front-wheel drive car manufactured and sold by Toyota from the 1980 to the 1999 model year. This vehicle was rated at 33 mpg in the city and 37 mpg on highway.

When the Tercel was introduced (to the US) in 1980, its official name was the Toyota Corolla Tercel. It was equipped with a 1.5-liter, 4-cylinder engine rated at 60 hp. The vehicle was then available only in two-door coupe and three-door hatchback body styles and transmission options include a 4-speed manual, 5-speed manual and 3-speed automatic units.


You wanna be the man, you gotta Name That Car!

Offline Otto Puzzell

  • Founder and
  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 31556
  • Country: us
  • Puzzle Points 444
  • Open field, with a window.
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
    • AutoPuzzles
Re: That was the (Automotive) Year that Was: 1980
« Reply #5 on: May 31, 2006, 01:31:54 PM »
Audi Quattro

San Cassiano, Italy - In 1973, Ferdinand Piech, the Audi board member responsible for technical development, established a personal objective to alter the Audi image through the introduction of new and innovative technology. Four years later, in February 1977, Audi's chief chassis engineer Jorg Bensinger contacted Piech with an idea that would become the brand's defining image.

Bensinger had just returned from some cold weather testing in Finland with the company's new 75 horsepower Iltis offroader. This strange little vehicle had easily and repeatedly out-performed everything else brought along for evaluation, including a range of mid-priced cars and some prototypes. So impressed was he by the superior handling and traction of the Iltis, Bensinger came up with the notion of implementing a comparable driveline concept for Audi's car range as part of the company's desire to join BMW and Mercedes at the upper end of the market.

Bensinger, with support from Walter Treser, then Audi's Director of Pre-Development, went to Piech with the request to start tests on such a vehicle based on the Audi 80. Piech, an engineer himself and a visionary who would later be criticized for his far-reaching goals while at the helm of VW, saw a much more ambitious role for all-wheel-drive. Piech and Audi's Board of Management wanted to build a sophisticated, high-performance sports coupe with permanent all-wheel-drive as an announcement of Audi's intention to play in the big leagues. They envisioned a car that would leave the opposition in the dust not only on the road, but in competition, putting the Audi name forward to the world in dramatic fashion.

Piech had laid the groundwork for such a vehicle. After all, he had more than a little background in the concept of distributing power to four wheels. His grandfather Ferdinand Porsche (recognize that name?) had built four-wheel-drive tow vehicles for the Austrian Army, electric cars with a motor at each wheel hub and, as the crowning achievement in this development, the Cisitalia racing car.

Bensinger had the unofficial go-ahead, but practically no money. Using existing budgets and components based on the Iltis, his hand-picked team, operating under strict security, set out to produce a homologation special. It was to be built in extremely small quantities to compete in rally racing, where the perceived advantages of the new technology could be showcased. The Iltis components were placed in a red two-door Audi 80 carrying the internal code A1, for All-Wheel-Drive 1.

The engine and transmission were left in the same location as the production front-drive Audi 80. Hans Nedvidek, the mechanic who had built gearboxes for the Grand Prix cars of Stirling Moss and Juan Manual Fangio, was charged with coming up with a system of transmitting power to the rear axle as well. He replaced the 80's live rear axle with a second Iltis differential housing, turned around 180 degrees and with no centre differential. A 160 horsepower engine destined for the future Audi 200 was "borrowed" for the purpose and in September 1977, mere months from that original conversation with Piech, Quattro got the green light from the Board of Management with the identification code EA-262. Two months later, the prototype of a production vehicle was cleared for testing on public roads.

The next and largest hurdle was gaining approval for actual volume production. At that time, Audi was a division within the Volkswagen group. VW held total responsibility to sales and marketing and held approval rights for all projects. In a sneaky way of getting past the politics and marketing manoeuvring of the boardroom, Audi invited key decision makers to a "tire test" in January 1978. It took place at Turracher Hohe, a location used by all German car makers at the time. The steepest road in Europe and snowbound at that time of year, Turracher Hohe was the ideal spot to demonstrate this new all-wheel-drive concept. Board members were impressed, but doubted there would be a market for 400 of these strange vehicles. Bensinger stepped up, promising to assume responsibility for Quattro sales personally. That turned the tide.

A minor issue occurred a few months later when one of the board members gave the test vehicle to his wife to drive in Vienna for a weekend. She complained that it "jumped around" a lot at slow speeds when parking and in tight turns. The team was urged to come up with a centre differential to eliminate the axle wind-up. Nedvidek to the rescue again, this time fitting the differential from an Audi 80 behind the transmission, driving this centre differential with a hollow shaft through which another shaft passed to drive the front differential and wheels. A shaft from the rear of this centre differential took power to the rear wheels. After a single short test, a budget of three million deutschmarks was approved for further development of Quattro, Audi's high-speed all-wheel-drive system.
You wanna be the man, you gotta Name That Car!

Offline Ultra

  • Founder, Publisher Emeritus &
  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 7506
  • Country: us
  • Puzzle Points 20
  • More than you bargained for
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
    • AutoPuzzles
Re: That was the (Automotive) Year that Was: 1980
« Reply #6 on: June 01, 2006, 01:13:47 AM »
Awesome stuff, Karn.  Thanks.  Hope to do my part here soon.
“Honi soit qui mal y pense”


Click the pic....... Name the car

Offline Arthur Dent

  • Feature Writer
  • *
  • Posts: 902
  • Country: ca
  • Puzzle Points 39
  • Nobody's Prefect
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
    • Old Car Junkie
Re: That was the (Automotive) Year that Was: 1980
« Reply #7 on: June 02, 2006, 12:35:03 AM »
1980

The Triumph TR8 conv  - the car the TR7 should have been. Powered by a 3.5L Rover V8 and a five speed manual gearbox, higher built quality than the early 7s it was praised by the press as the re-invention of the British sports car. Sadly less tha 2500 or so were made due to an unfavorable exchange rate and gas crunch. With the prices of Corbas and Sunbeam Tigers as high as they are the TR8 could be a bargin.


Offline Rich

  • Feature Writer
  • *
  • Posts: 1036
  • Country: us
  • Puzzle Points 11
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: That was the (Automotive) Year that Was: 1980
« Reply #8 on: June 02, 2006, 12:58:12 AM »
I soooo remember wanting a TR-8; was one year into college though so cash-flow was a bit of a problem.... :(

Offline Otto Puzzell

  • Founder and
  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 31556
  • Country: us
  • Puzzle Points 444
  • Open field, with a window.
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
    • AutoPuzzles
Re: That was the (Automotive) Year that Was: 1980
« Reply #9 on: June 04, 2006, 07:01:23 AM »
Dennis Firestone (born July 22, 1944 in Townsville, Australia) is the only starter in the 1980 Indy 500 who is not a US citizen! Firestone was the Rookie of the Year in the 1980 CART season, finishing in 12th in season points, his best season. His best finish in a CART race was a pair of 5th places that year. He made 5 starts in the Indianapolis 500 with a best finish of 10th in 1981.

John (Johnny) Sherman Rutherford, III (AKA Lonestar J.R) won the classic that year, one of only 4 drivers on the lead lap. The others were Tom Sneva, Gary Bettenhausen and Gordon Johncock. 


Johnny Rutherford in the #4 Pennzoil Special (Chaparral/Cosworth) after qualifying.
« Last Edit: June 04, 2006, 07:09:08 AM by KarnUtz »
You wanna be the man, you gotta Name That Car!

Offline roopull

  • *
  • Posts: 24
  • Puzzle Points 0
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: That was the (Automotive) Year that Was: 1980
« Reply #10 on: June 05, 2006, 05:08:13 PM »
And all this time I thought the TR8 had a Buick V8 under the bonnet...  I suppose my ignorance is forgiveable... I turned 6 in 1980!
Quote from: MG
Cigarettes are FAR more deadly than marijuana. Cigarettes are protected by government licensing while marijuana is banned. Do you need to know any more about government?    :cry:

www.lp.org   www.cato.org   www.ehowa.com  www.carnuts.us  www.unitedpackagesmashers.com

Offline Arthur Dent

  • Feature Writer
  • *
  • Posts: 902
  • Country: ca
  • Puzzle Points 39
  • Nobody's Prefect
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
    • Old Car Junkie
Re: That was the (Automotive) Year that Was: 1980
« Reply #11 on: June 05, 2006, 10:44:29 PM »
And all this time I thought the TR8 had a Buick V8 under the bonnet...  I suppose my ignorance is forgiveable... I turned 6 in 1980!

Rover bought the rights from Buick for the engine and re-worked it a bit for their cars.

Offline roopull

  • *
  • Posts: 24
  • Puzzle Points 0
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: That was the (Automotive) Year that Was: 1980
« Reply #12 on: June 08, 2006, 06:49:03 AM »
And all this time I thought the TR8 had a Buick V8 under the bonnet...  I suppose my ignorance is forgiveable... I turned 6 in 1980!

Rover bought the rights from Buick for the engine and re-worked it a bit for their cars.
Ah-HA!  I dun learnt sumfin new! 

What'd they do?  Install smoke in the wiring, replace rubber gaskets with paper towels, & find a way to cut the horsepower in half? :o ;D
Quote from: MG
Cigarettes are FAR more deadly than marijuana. Cigarettes are protected by government licensing while marijuana is banned. Do you need to know any more about government?    :cry:

www.lp.org   www.cato.org   www.ehowa.com  www.carnuts.us  www.unitedpackagesmashers.com

Offline Arthur Dent

  • Feature Writer
  • *
  • Posts: 902
  • Country: ca
  • Puzzle Points 39
  • Nobody's Prefect
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
    • Old Car Junkie
Re: That was the (Automotive) Year that Was: 1980
« Reply #13 on: June 09, 2006, 11:07:31 PM »
And all this time I thought the TR8 had a Buick V8 under the bonnet...  I suppose my ignorance is forgiveable... I turned 6 in 1980!

Rover bought the rights from Buick for the engine and re-worked it a bit for their cars.
Ah-HA!  I dun learnt sumfin new! 

What'd they do?  Install smoke in the wiring, replace rubber gaskets with paper towels, & find a way to cut the horsepower in half? :o ;D

haha - something like that.

Want more? Ok Buick developed an iron block V6 off the same motor which the current 3.8L OHV V6 is evolved from

Offline Otto Puzzell

  • Founder and
  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 31556
  • Country: us
  • Puzzle Points 444
  • Open field, with a window.
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
    • AutoPuzzles
Re: That was the (Automotive) Year that Was: 1980
« Reply #14 on: June 15, 2006, 04:03:59 PM »

haha - something like that.

Want more? Ok Buick developed an iron block V6 off the same motor which the current 3.8L OHV V6 is evolved from

Even more:

Buick sold the V6 tooling to Kaiser-Jeep in 1967 - the same year the pawned off the V8 to Rover. Some time after AMC bought Jeep, the '70's fuel crisis prompted GM to buy the tooling back! Thereafter, until the very recent switch to a DCX V6, Jeep CJ's and Wranglers used the AMC in-line 6 design that had soldiered on for years under the hoods of Americans, Rebels, Gremlins, Hornets, and other AMC models.
You wanna be the man, you gotta Name That Car!

Offline Arthur Dent

  • Feature Writer
  • *
  • Posts: 902
  • Country: ca
  • Puzzle Points 39
  • Nobody's Prefect
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
    • Old Car Junkie
Re: That was the (Automotive) Year that Was: 1980
« Reply #15 on: June 16, 2006, 01:04:59 AM »

haha - something like that.

Want more? Ok Buick developed an iron block V6 off the same motor which the current 3.8L OHV V6 is evolved from

Even more:

Buick sold the V6 tooling to Kaiser-Jeep in 1967 - the same year the pawned off the V8 to Rover. Some time after AMC bought Jeep, the '70's fuel crisis prompted GM to buy the tooling back! Thereafter, until the very recent switch to a DCX V6, Jeep CJ's and Wranglers used the AMC in-line 6 design that had soldiered on for years under the hoods of Americans, Rebels, Gremlins, Hornets, and other AMC models.

Those early V6s kept the V8 firing order (minus two cylinders) and were quite rough running gaining the nickname "oddfire V6" - eventually in the late 70s they were changed to a more traditional V6 firing order.

Offline Jagman

  • Feature Writer
  • *
  • Posts: 254
  • Country: us
  • Puzzle Points 6
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
    • Dave's Jag
Re: That was the (Automotive) Year that Was: 1980
« Reply #16 on: June 30, 2006, 06:27:45 PM »
Re: WalterTreser and Audi......

Treser also developed some Audi tuner specials that were sold in selected Audi dealerships - including ours. These cars had special suspension, really large (for the times) wheels, tires and brakes, along with spoilers front and rear and fender modifications. They were supposed to be stock mechanically, but I know for a fact that they tweaked the boost and ign settings.

He also developed a hardtop convertible for the Audi coupe, but the car was deemed too expensive to sell in numbers large enough to support the investment. here's a pic of one......


This is a pic of a Treser 5000 turbo, it's probably an 84, since it doesn't have the trunk spoiler. Note the blacked lenses, lower body cladding and big wheels and tires.........