Author Topic: Solved -PJ651- Ford Sprint Car for sale by Chaseside in 1954  (Read 3660 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nicanary

  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 18362
  • Country: gb
  • Puzzle Points 624
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: PJ - 651
« Reply #25 on: March 01, 2015, 05:55:53 AM »
Is this car a homebuilt called the "XXX Special" or something similar? I still think that's a Peel glassfibre body which someone has fitted to a Ford 1172 s/v base.
I must be right - that's what it says on Wikipedia

Offline Paul Jaray

  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 22326
  • Country: it
  • Puzzle Points 2073
  • MVP
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: PJ - 651
« Reply #26 on: March 01, 2015, 06:05:04 AM »
It is quite particular.
Not based on a 1172.
Not called Special.
Some interesting features there ;)

Offline richard cuyler

  • Expert
  • *
  • Posts: 2313
  • Country: gb
  • Puzzle Points 78
  • Retired architect. Likes to keep people smiling.
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: PJ - 651
« Reply #27 on: March 01, 2015, 07:48:54 AM »
This is a real puzzler - I think it may have Anglia 105E components, judging by the wheels. If this is so, I'll have a better chance of finding out what it is.

Offline Paul Jaray

  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 22326
  • Country: it
  • Puzzle Points 2073
  • MVP
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: PJ - 651
« Reply #28 on: March 03, 2015, 03:22:49 AM »
This is a real puzzler - I think it may have Anglia 105E components, judging by the wheels. If this is so, I'll have a better chance of finding out what it is.
About the engine: bore 2.6 stroke 3.64  ;)

Offline nicanary

  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 18362
  • Country: gb
  • Puzzle Points 624
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: PJ - 651
« Reply #29 on: March 03, 2015, 06:52:19 AM »
My head hurts. I haven't done calculations like that since I left school in 1969. My sums say it's a Zephyr engine.

No it's not - my second working says it's 25.03ci per cylinder. That's 410cc per cylinder.

So it's around 1600cc if it's a 4-cylinder motor, or 2440cc if it's a 6-cylinder, so my Zephyr guess could be right.

NURSE!!!!!
« Last Edit: March 03, 2015, 06:56:54 AM by nicanary »
I must be right - that's what it says on Wikipedia

Offline Paul Jaray

  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 22326
  • Country: it
  • Puzzle Points 2073
  • MVP
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: PJ - 651
« Reply #30 on: March 03, 2015, 06:57:35 AM »
I don't know...I only know bore & stroke  ;D

Offline Wendax

  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 62593
  • Country: de
  • Puzzle Points 2344
  • e^^(i*pi)+1=0
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: PJ - 651
« Reply #31 on: March 03, 2015, 07:27:09 AM »
It's rather (2.6/2) * (2.6/2) * 3.64 * Pi = 19,32 Cu.in per cylinder (or 316.7 cc per cylinder). In case it is a four-cylinder engine, we would have 1267 cc displacement, or a little less regarding how many digits you take for Pi.

The displacement would fit a Standard Ten, but that was a long-stroke engine (100 mm = 39.3 in).
Then there is the Hillman Minx engine: 1265 cc, 2.56 × 3.74 in, which would come closer.

Offline nicanary

  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 18362
  • Country: gb
  • Puzzle Points 624
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: PJ - 651
« Reply #32 on: March 03, 2015, 07:35:52 AM »
It's rather (2.6/2) * (2.6/2) * 3.64 * Pi = 19,32 Cu.in per cylinder (or 316.7 cc per cylinder). In case it is a four-cylinder engine, we would have 1267 cc displacement, or a little less regarding how many digits you take for Pi.

The displacement would fit a Standard Ten, but that was a long-stroke engine (100 mm = 39.3 in).
Then there is the Hillman Minx engine: 1265 cc, 2.56 × 3.74 in, which would come closer.

We had to hand back our slide-rules when we left school.  ;D
I must be right - that's what it says on Wikipedia

Offline Paul Jaray

  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 22326
  • Country: it
  • Puzzle Points 2073
  • MVP
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: PJ - 651
« Reply #33 on: March 03, 2015, 07:43:24 AM »
I tried all the options (4,6 & 8 ) but couldn' find the matching unit.
I know they already modified a Ford V8 in the 30s.
« Last Edit: March 03, 2015, 07:50:27 AM by Paul Jaray »

Offline nicanary

  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 18362
  • Country: gb
  • Puzzle Points 624
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: PJ - 651
« Reply #34 on: March 03, 2015, 07:49:39 AM »
Batten ?
I must be right - that's what it says on Wikipedia

Offline Paul Jaray

  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 22326
  • Country: it
  • Puzzle Points 2073
  • MVP
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: PJ - 651
« Reply #35 on: March 03, 2015, 07:50:55 AM »
Not Batten or a race car.

Offline richard cuyler

  • Expert
  • *
  • Posts: 2313
  • Country: gb
  • Puzzle Points 78
  • Retired architect. Likes to keep people smiling.
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: PJ - 651
« Reply #36 on: March 04, 2015, 07:27:33 AM »
The 105E engine was a brilliant little thing. Bore 80.96mm (3 3/16"), stroke 48.41mm (1 29/32"). No wonder it could rev so high when modified. If it was much modified, the centre main cast iron bearing cap could fail and those who knew this would fit a steel unit to prevent expensive problems.

Offline Paul Jaray

  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 22326
  • Country: it
  • Puzzle Points 2073
  • MVP
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: PJ - 651
« Reply #37 on: March 04, 2015, 07:30:09 AM »
I don't know if this may help but this car is mid-engined!

Offline nicanary

  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 18362
  • Country: gb
  • Puzzle Points 624
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: PJ - 651
« Reply #38 on: March 04, 2015, 07:39:53 AM »
I don't know if this may help but this car is mid-engined!

QUE!!!?????

Now that I've calmed down - it's Ford mid-engined and built by a company with connections to Ford who had pre-war modified a Ford V8.

Was the builder a well-known franchised Ford dealer, like the Harrisons?
« Last Edit: March 04, 2015, 07:46:03 AM by nicanary »
I must be right - that's what it says on Wikipedia

Offline Paul Jaray

  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 22326
  • Country: it
  • Puzzle Points 2073
  • MVP
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: PJ - 651
« Reply #39 on: March 04, 2015, 07:48:15 AM »
I don't know if this may help but this car is mid-engined!

QUE!!!?????

Now that I've calmed down - it's Ford mid-engined and built by a company with connections to Ford who had pre-war modified a Ford V8.

Was the builder a well-known franchised Ford dealer, like the Harrisons?
so far so good... ;)
(I don't know if it is well known...)

Offline nicanary

  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 18362
  • Country: gb
  • Puzzle Points 624
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: PJ - 651
« Reply #40 on: March 05, 2015, 09:11:32 AM »
I know you probably won't know the answer, but my mind has me thinking strange ideas. It would have been very odd for a garage to think in terms of a mid-engined car at that time (for road use) - I wonder if they got the idea from the WW2 Bren Gun Carrier? Indeed I wonder if some of the components come from one of those.
I must be right - that's what it says on Wikipedia

Offline Paul Jaray

  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 22326
  • Country: it
  • Puzzle Points 2073
  • MVP
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: PJ - 651
« Reply #41 on: March 05, 2015, 09:34:04 AM »
I am not sure if they actually build the car or just proposed it for sale.
They worked on at least 2 Ford V8s and in both cases they were aerodinamically shaped: streamlined body, vertical fin, covered wheels and rounded fenders (not all those elements in both cars, of course).

Offline Wendax

  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 62593
  • Country: de
  • Puzzle Points 2344
  • e^^(i*pi)+1=0
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: PJ - 651
« Reply #42 on: March 05, 2015, 09:41:33 AM »
W.J. Reynolds?

Offline Paul Jaray

  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 22326
  • Country: it
  • Puzzle Points 2073
  • MVP
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: PJ - 651
« Reply #43 on: March 05, 2015, 10:18:43 AM »
Not Reynolds.

Offline nicanary

  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 18362
  • Country: gb
  • Puzzle Points 624
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: PJ - 651
« Reply #44 on: March 05, 2015, 11:23:33 AM »
Bristol Street Motors?
I must be right - that's what it says on Wikipedia

Offline Paul Jaray

  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 22326
  • Country: it
  • Puzzle Points 2073
  • MVP
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: PJ - 651
« Reply #45 on: March 05, 2015, 11:50:06 AM »
Not them.

Offline D-type

  • Expert
  • *
  • Posts: 8138
  • Country: gb
  • Puzzle Points 251
  • A retired civil engineer interested in cars
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: PJ - 651
« Reply #46 on: March 08, 2015, 02:45:17 PM »
An Allard connection?
Duncan Rollo

The more you learn, the more you realise how little you know.

Offline Paul Jaray

  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 22326
  • Country: it
  • Puzzle Points 2073
  • MVP
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: PJ - 651
« Reply #47 on: March 08, 2015, 03:14:30 PM »
Not that I'm aware of.

Offline Paul Jaray

  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 22326
  • Country: it
  • Puzzle Points 2073
  • MVP
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: PJ - 651
« Reply #48 on: March 23, 2015, 05:56:51 AM »
How many Ford dealers were there? It can be solved.

Offline nicanary

  • Editor
  • *
  • Posts: 18362
  • Country: gb
  • Puzzle Points 624
  • YearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYearsYears
Re: PJ - 651
« Reply #49 on: March 23, 2015, 06:41:11 AM »
How many Ford dealers were there? It can be solved.

I'll be in my coffin by the time I've gone through them all!  ;D
I must be right - that's what it says on Wikipedia