Author Topic: Ubb51 Nash 480 Aeropower 1930 (Read 1751 times)

mekubb · « **Reply #25 on:** February 10, 2013, 05:46:04 PM »

Not Hupmobile and not Auburn, keep on digging gentlemen

nicanary · « **Reply #26 on:** February 11, 2013, 05:06:59 AM »

I'm guessing it's something very unusual. Is it a Willys?

mekubb · « **Reply #27 on:** February 11, 2013, 10:30:45 AM »

Not Willys... the manufacturer is well-known by the way

nicanary · « **Reply #28 on:** February 11, 2013, 10:55:57 AM »

Hudson?

D-type · « **Reply #29 on:** February 11, 2013, 02:22:48 PM »

Is the maker of the car (chassis) the same as the maker of the engine?

mekubb · « **Reply #30 on:** February 11, 2013, 03:03:50 PM »

Quote from: nicanary on February 11, 2013, 10:55:57 AM

Hudson?

Not a Hudson

Quote from: D-type on February 11, 2013, 02:22:48 PM

Is the maker of the car (chassis) the same as the maker of the engine?

I believe so, that means I have not a clue that it is otherwise

targhediferro · « **Reply #31 on:** February 11, 2013, 03:07:44 PM »

Duesemberg?

D-type · « **Reply #32 on:** February 11, 2013, 06:49:32 PM »

Posted by mistake - please ignore

mekubb · « **Reply #33 on:** February 12, 2013, 07:41:46 AM »

Not Duesenberg...

nicanary · « **Reply #34 on:** February 12, 2013, 07:59:10 AM »

Packard?

mekubb · « **Reply #35 on:** February 12, 2013, 08:41:06 AM »

Not Packard either..

nicanary · « **Reply #36 on:** February 12, 2013, 08:47:56 AM »

You say the maker is well-known, but not one of....

Ford
Miller
Chrysler
Stutz
Studebaker
Chevrolet
Buick
Hupmobile
Auburn
Willys
Hudson
Duesenberg
Packard

There were many US makers at this time (I'm guessing 1928/30) but most couldn't afford to go racing because of the Depression. I'm frustrated I can't get this.

Dodge?

mekubb · « **Reply #37 on:** February 12, 2013, 11:12:33 AM »

Not Dodge... I can imagine you're getting a bit upset, I have experienced that several time already in Autopuzzles

The manufacturer is not well-known for its race cars but more for normal/regular vehicles (if that helps). Your time frame is correct by the way

Hiawatha · « **Reply #38 on:** February 12, 2013, 11:30:38 AM »

Oakland?

targhediferro · « **Reply #39 on:** February 12, 2013, 11:30:55 AM »

cadillac?

nicanary · « **Reply #40 on:** February 12, 2013, 11:57:21 AM »

Essex?

mekubb · « **Reply #41 on:** February 13, 2013, 02:50:21 AM »

Not Oakland, Essex or Cadillac gentlemen....

targhediferro · « **Reply #42 on:** February 13, 2013, 02:52:51 AM »

oldsmobile?

mekubb · « **Reply #43 on:** February 13, 2013, 02:58:36 AM »

Not an Oldsmobile as well

Hiawatha · « **Reply #44 on:** February 13, 2013, 03:12:39 AM »

Marmon?

mekubb · « **Reply #45 on:** February 13, 2013, 04:42:05 AM »

Not Marmon... not many left...

targhediferro · « **Reply #46 on:** February 13, 2013, 04:48:38 AM »

Plymouth?

nicanary · « **Reply #47 on:** February 13, 2013, 05:11:05 AM »

Nash?

Hiawatha · « **Reply #48 on:** February 13, 2013, 05:13:14 AM »

mekubb · « **Reply #49 on:** February 13, 2013, 06:08:28 AM »

Not Plymouth and Reo...

Quote from: nicanary on February 13, 2013, 05:11:05 AM

Nash?

But Nash is right ! Locked for you 24 h to find out the model

News:

Author Topic: Ubb51 Nash 480 Aeropower 1930 (Read 1751 times)