Author Topic: Puzzle #141 - Solved! Rollston Duesenberg JN (Read 5225 times)

Otto Puzzell · « **on:** December 19, 2006, 03:37:06 AM »

Know what it is?

Please, respond below and let us know what car you think you see here.

If you haven't registered yet, you need to do so in order to reply with your answer. You can do so by clicking here.

Also, please be sure to check out our other puzzles.

Thanks!

MG · « **Reply #1 on:** December 19, 2006, 11:28:39 AM »

The red paint in the center of the wheel nut was a Packard trademark.

The overall ARROGANCE of the design reminds me of Charles DeGaulle, he with the schnozzola big enough to blot out the sun.

It could also be a Deusenberg. Whatever it is, it clearly has a straight something engine - Straight 12, perhaps?

With so many perhaps and maybes in the above, KU will have little problem without revealing a damn thing.

So, we KNOW it is bigger than a breadbox. It IS American, no?

Otto Puzzell · « **Reply #2 on:** December 19, 2006, 11:57:00 AM »

MG · « **Reply #3 on:** December 19, 2006, 02:48:45 PM »

Is it a Packard?

Otto Puzzell · « **Reply #4 on:** December 19, 2006, 02:57:45 PM »

Not a Packard

MG · « **Reply #5 on:** December 19, 2006, 03:28:40 PM »

OK. My second choice is Deusenberg.

Otto Puzzell · « **Reply #6 on:** December 19, 2006, 03:42:04 PM »

Can you be more specific?

cheater · « **Reply #7 on:** December 19, 2006, 04:23:42 PM »

1937 Duesenberg JN Berline by Rollston

For Duesey, it's a pretty ugly car from the front . . .

MG · « **Reply #8 on:** December 19, 2006, 05:25:44 PM »

a pretty ugly car from the front . .

Well, I dunno. It has a certain DISDAINFUL presence that is appealing - in an ugly sort of way.

Can I get half credit here? I really need to beat Rich to 5. Its a matter of personal honor.

.

cheater · « **Reply #9 on:** December 19, 2006, 07:58:07 PM »

MG,

If you had spelled Duesenberg correctly, I'd be on your side for half-credit, but since you didn't . . .

MG · « **Reply #10 on:** December 19, 2006, 08:22:41 PM »

Whoa! THAT is COLD!

So...the rule is "e "before"u" except after "d"? As a language convention, THAT is a doozy!

cheater · « **Reply #11 on:** December 19, 2006, 09:29:18 PM »

Yeah, it WAS pretty cold, but I bet you won't wrong ever again!

Just remember, Doozey starts with "dues" . . . with proper names, you can toss the "conventions" out the window.

MG · « **Reply #12 on:** December 19, 2006, 09:52:40 PM »

but I bet you won't wrong ever again!

You can say THAT again twice!

Otto Puzzell · « **Reply #13 on:** December 20, 2006, 02:54:25 AM »

Quote from: cheater on December 19, 2006, 04:23:42 PM

1937 Duesenberg JN Berline by Rollston

For Duesey, it's a pretty ugly car from the front . . .

Yes, and yes!

MG · « **Reply #14 on:** December 20, 2006, 07:07:16 AM »

Hey, cheater! Here's a thought. Why don't I just toss YOU out the window?!?!?

Besides, it is intuitively obvious to the most casual observer that this car was the inspiration for the original Grand Am.

So there.

porridgehead · « **Reply #15 on:** December 20, 2006, 08:27:43 AM »

The hell with the nose, lookit the size of that horn!

MG · « **Reply #16 on:** December 20, 2006, 12:50:49 PM »

You are absolutely right, P-Brain.

THAT is a HORN!!!!

Otto Puzzell · « **Reply #17 on:** December 21, 2006, 12:19:48 PM »

But it looks like a towel rack.

Tifosi · « **Reply #18 on:** December 21, 2006, 10:13:17 PM »

For some reason, maybe the huge headlights, it looks like something Brooks Stevens might have been involved with. Was he?

Dan

cheater · « **Reply #19 on:** December 21, 2006, 11:53:19 PM »

Tifosi, those are the standard Duesenberg headlamps, though mounted lower on this than on most Dueseys.

I actually got to meet Brooks through a common friend some years back and ran the slide projector for him at a lecture he gave locally. I'm not certain he would have been pleased by your comment!

Tifosi · « **Reply #20 on:** December 22, 2006, 03:04:22 PM »

Quote from: cheater on December 21, 2006, 11:53:19 PM

Tifosi, those are the standard Duesenberg headlamps, though mounted lower on this than on most Dueseys.

I actually got to meet Brooks through a common friend some years back and ran the slide projector for him at a lecture he gave locally. I'm not certain he would have been pleased by your comment!

I didn't mean any disrespect to Mr. Stevens. I have seen several of his sketches, specifically the Jeep Wagoneer and Gaylord, which features rather large, prominent headlamps. I noticed a similarity, and just wondered. Sometimes, excellent designs are compromised by events beyond the control of the designer, and I thought maybe this was the case here. I can see now that those are indeed stock Deusenberg headlamps.

Dan

cheater · « **Reply #21 on:** December 22, 2006, 04:39:22 PM »

Dan, I was just kidding and meant no offense.

Brooks had very strong opinions about design (as do almost all designers,actually) and I was simply suggesting that he had IMO a little better sense of style than is exhibited by that Rollston berline. At least, most of the cars I know him to have done seemed to . . .

Wonder who did design the front end of that vehicle? Anyone know? My best Duesey references are boxed up.

Otto Puzzell · « **Reply #22 on:** December 23, 2006, 03:08:29 AM »

Old Brooks was known to let fly with a 'challenging' schnoz from time to time. Witness not just the Weinermobile, but the Die Valkyrie, for instance.

The beluga-like protuberance on the Duesenberg was not designed or built by Rollston. It was a Rollston-bodied car that was modified by its Chicago, Illinois owner, Stephen Junkunc III, in 1937.

Tifosi · « **Reply #23 on:** December 23, 2006, 11:14:36 AM »

Yeah, the Die Valkyrie was a rather odd looking car, classic, but odd...the Scimitar was much better, IMO.

Dan

News:

Author Topic: Puzzle #141 - Solved! Rollston Duesenberg JN (Read 5225 times)